Commercialization of Agricultural Technical Knowledge

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Agricultural Economics , Assistant Professor, Agricultural Research and Training Organization (AREEO) (Corresponding Author).

2 , Ph.D. on Agricultural Economics, Assistant Professor on Research, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Pistachio Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO).Rafsanjan, IranOrganization (AREEO).Rafsanjan

3 MSc in Fisheries Environment - Research Coordinator, Agricultural Research and Training Organization (AREEO)

Abstract

In this study, the effects and effective factors on the agricultural research technical knowledge transfer market from the perspective of researchers and buyers of technical knowledge in the years 2015 and 2016 have been discussed using a survey research method. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, to measure the internal consistency of the questionnaire, has been estimated at 0.84, which shows appropriate homogeneity. By examining 95 cases of commercialized technical knowledge, the results show, 8.2 job opportunities, 20,150 million Rials added value, 475 million Rials saved in reducing the consumption of inputs, 254 thousand dollars in foreign exchange savings and 938.6 million Rials in attracting capital per Technology is estimated. With one rial spent on agricultural technology research, it has 5.13 rials (including foreign exchange savings) and 2.43 rials (not including) income per year. For 11 years useful life of each technology, 21.6 rials of income is estimated. Tax exemption, bank interest and protective laws are the most important factors affecting the success and high rate of bank facilities, the existence of various guarantees and high cost of production are the factors affecting the failure of the organization’s technical knowledge transfer.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bernolak, I. (2001). Linking managerial actions to productivity measures. International Productivity Journal,‌26(7): 29-38.
Bozemon, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5): 627-55.
Braun, M., D. Brown, G. Graf, J. Leroyer, H. Sabisch, D. Messner, D. Rouach and P. Santi.‌(2000).‌Getting more innovation from public research. European Commission, Good practice in technology transfer from large public research institutions:‌Enterprise Directorate General,‌EUR 17026,‌Available at: https://cordis. europa.eu.
Dalmarco, Gustavo‌; Hulsink, Willem‌; Blois, Guilherme V.(2018). Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy : evidence from Brazil.Technological forecasting & social change : an international journal. - Amsterdam : Elsevier, ISSN 0040-1625,‌ZDB-ID 280700-2. - Vol. 135, p. 99-111
Dwitya K.AmryabAli J. AhmadaDaweiL ua.(2021). The new inclusive role of university technology transfer: Setting an agenda for further research. International Journal of Innovation‌Studies.Volume‌5,‌Issue 1,‌Pages‌9-22.
Ellingsen.o. (2017). Commercialization within advanced manufacturing: value stream mapping as a tool for efficient learning. Procedia CIRP 60 , 374 - 379
Ghazinoori, S.R.( 2005). Strategies and trends for commercialization and marketing of high technologies Case study: Nanotechnology in Iran, 2nd Management of Technology Iranian Conference, Tehran, Iran.
Grabler,I. Pohler,A,Hentze,J.(2017). Decoupling of product and production development in flexible production environments.Procedia CIRP 60,548-553
Lai, W. and C. Tsai.( 2009). Fuzzy rule-based analysis of firm’s technology transfer in Taiwan’s machinery industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 12012-12022.
Liu, H. and Y. Jiang.( 2001). Technology transfer from higher education institutions to industry in China: nature and implications. Technovation, 21: 175-188.
Sohn,‌S.Y.‌and T. H.‌Moon.(‌2004). Structural equation model for predicting technology commercialization success index (TCSI).‌Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(9): 885-899.